The black points, and the associated red error bars, are
the ACRIM 3 measures and their 1-sigma uncertainties. The blue circles
are expected values from a geometrical orbit and solar limb darkening model
(discussed below), during the transit (at 5 minute intervals) while the Sun
was visible to ACRIMSAT. The Sun, as seen from ACRIMSAT, was occulted by
the Earth during the times indicated by the regions of the vertical gray bars
in the above graph, thus no data were obtained during those intervals.
THE ACRIMSAT "VIEW" OF THE TRANSIT
The path of (the center of) Venus, as seen from ACRIMSAT,
is depicted in the figure below (North is up in the figure). As previously
noted, the planetary parallax (shifting of the line-of-sight to Venus) induced
by the spacecraft orbit, projected onto the disk of the Sun causes periodic
spatial and temporal modulations in the location of Venus as it traverses
the solar disk. The "vertical" amplitude variation (i.e., in the North/South
direction) result from the near-polar ACRIMSAT orbit. As Venus is of similar
size as the Earth, and as ACRIMSAT is in a low Earth orbit, the vertical
excursions are also comparable (but a bit larger than) to the diameter of
Venus. The "horizontal" (East/West) component manifests itself in non-linear
spacings in the planetary position along its projected path in equal time
intervals. This results from the ACRIMSAT orbit plane not being
in the line-of-sight direction to the Sun. Note: with
TRACE
the modulation is more closely sinusoidal, as its orbit is perpendicular
to the Earth/Sun line, but deviates from a linear (in spacecraft orbital
phase angle) sinusoid because of the planet's orbital motion about the Sun.
LIGHT CURVE ASYMMETRIES
As a result of the reflective spacecraft parallactic motion of Venus,
its path across the Sun "nods" in heliocentric radius (r). A table
(in five minute increments) of the positions of Venus against the solar disk,
relative to the heliocenter as seen from ACRIMSAT is given
HERE.
This motion induces asymmetries in the ACRIM radiometric "light curve"
as Venus occults portions of the solar disk of differing surface brightnesses
(flux densities) in a radially dependent manner due to solar limb darkening.
One can see that during ingress Venus crosses from r = 1.0 to r =
0.9 (where the limb darkening function has a very steep gradient) twice as
slowly as it does from r=0.9 to r = 1.0 upon egress. Hence, the downward
slope of the ingress light curve will be more shallow than during egress.
Additionally, one would expect small amplitude, orbit periodic variations
in the intensity variations measured by ACRIM Venus "oscillates" between
the brighter (smaller r) portion of the photosphere and positions closer
to the solar limb (larger r). This is, at least in part for some of the "wiggles"
which are seen at the "bottom" of the light curve, though some variation
may also be due to intrinsic variations in the global TSI over the same
time interval, and also as Venus occults regions of the photosphere which
may be intrinsically brighter or dimmer (as discussed later).
THE EFFECT OF LIMB DARKENING
A statistically significant shallow diminution in the radiometric
flux density is seen after second contact but before mid transit, i.e.,
approximately -0.04% at 05:50 UT and approximately -0.08% at 06:15 UT compared
to approximately -0.10% at mid transit, and a corresponding gradual rise
before the loss of data due to Earth occultation upon egress. This
is attributable to radially differentiated solar limb darkening, with a strong
photospheric radial surface brightness gradient as the limb of the Sun is
approached. At 05:50 UT the center of Venus was app 0.933 solar radii from
the heliocenter, whereas at mid-transit (appx 08:35 UT) the center of Venus
was 0.650 solar radii from the heliocenter. This non-linearity in impact
distance with time arises, primarily, from the modulation in Venus’s heliocentric
velocity vector w.r.t. the limb (e.g., affecting the “limb crossing angles”)
induced by ACRIMSATs orbital parallax.
A MODEL LIGHT CURVE
We constructed a “model” light curve by building a series of two-dimensional
synthetic images of the Sun, geometrically occulted by Venus as determined
by the ACRIMSAT orbital ephemeris.
Synthetic transit image for 05:40UT as seen from ACRIMSAT.
The synthetic solar images were limb-darkened with a resulting photospheric
surface brightness radial profile, F(u), parametrically represented as suggested
by
Hestroffer
and Magan (Astron. & Astroph. 333, 338, 1998):
F(u) = 1 - a(1-u^b)
where: u = sqrt(1-r^2)
with r being the fractional solar radius.
This limb darkening function (in central intensity normalized
form) and as used to generate a limb-darkened model image (shown 7.5% intensity
contour intervals) are illustrated below:
A few other limb darkening references:
Greve & Neckel 1996 (2000-3000 angstoms)
Pierce & Slaughter 1977 (3033-7297 angstroms)
Koutchmy, Koutchmy & Kotov 1977 (1-4 microns)
Petro, Foukal, Rosen, Kurucz &
Pierce 1984 (optical variability)
LIGHT CURVE FITTING
With iterative convergence, minimizing the sum of the squares of the
residuals in the observed minus computed model data, the model light curve
which best fits the ACRIM 3 data has
F(u) characterized with
a = 0.85 and
b = 0.80, and recovered times of contacts
very closely agreeing with expectations based upon the spacecraft orbital
ephemeris.
|
VENUS TRANSIT CONTACT TIMES FROM ACRIMSAT
Contact I (external tangency at ingress) = 05:10:19
UT
Contact II (internal tangency at ingress) = 05:35:35
UT
Contact III (internal tangency at egress) = 10:59:15
UT
Contact IV (external tangency at egress) = 11:29:30
UT
|
The total area-integrated flux density (i.e., the TSI) “predicted” by
the limb-darkened model as Venus transits the solar disk is compared to
the ACRIM 3 radiometric measures for times when the Sun was visible to ACRIMSAT
(overlaid in blue on the light curve plot).
HOW GOOD IS THE FIT?
We use the as-measured TSI variations in the flanking out-of-transit
radiometry to assess "how good" (or deficient) our relatively simple model
light curve fits the data. I.e., how much of the fit residuals are
due to instrumental measurement errors and intrinsic solar variations compared
to imperfections in the model itself. "Variations", here, not only
include temporal variations in (area integrated) TSI but also spatially as
Venus covers different parts of the photosphere that are not isotropic in
intensity on small spatial scales.
The left and right panels in the figure below show the distribution functions
of the light curve fit residuals from three contiguous orbits (approximately
5 hours) of pre and post transit data (green), immediately before C
I and after C IV. The median TSI measured for each of those periods
differ by only 0.0002%, i.e. "constant" within the measurement errors. Conceivably
there could be larger intrinsic solar variations during the time interval
of the transit itself. The measured variation in TSI during these 5-hour
flanking periods is approximately 0.008% at the 1 sigma level. The
1-sigma residuals from the model light curve fit to the data during the period
of the transit (red) are approximately 0.01%.
The difference in the dispersion in in-transit compared to pre/post-transit
model light curve fit residuals is +25% in "
as measured" TSI variability
(after subtracting out the model light curve). This in-transit increase
in the dispersion in TSI of 0.002% is an order of magnitude larger than the
dispersions about the median as-measured TSI's before and after the transit.
One may posit one or more instrumental (1), systematic (2), and or real
physical effects (3 and 4) contributing to this increase as delineated below:
- Uncertainties in the end-to-end wavelength-dependent system responsivity
function for ACRIM under its very broad pass band (i.e., its spectral
sensitivity). These uncertainties are likely insignificant based upon
the ACRIM 3 cavity design and pre-launch testing.
- Insufficient fidelity in the limb darkening model. A quadratic
model may be better, and could be tested, but a higher order (multi-parametric)
model is likely unjustified given the interrupted phase coverage and single-epoch-only
nature of the light curve.
- The effect of the atmosphere of Venus itself.
- The effect of Venus occulting regions of the photosphere differing
in brightness on small spatial scales.
Neglecting or better characterizing (1) a higher order limb-darkening
model (2) may be employed and tested by by parametric variation bounded by
the instrumental spectral sensitivity calibration. With that, rigorous detection
limits for the planetary atmosphere (3) may be ascertained, within the uncertainties
in the local variations in photospheric intensity at the spatial scales
of Venus (4).
VENUS 2004 - A SURROGATE TO AN EXTRASOLAR TERRESTRIAL PLANETARY
TRANSIT
What measured TSI variation resulted from position-dependent photospheric
occultation for the actual “path” that Venus took is (and must remain) conjectural,
as ACRIM 3 “sees” the Sun as a spatially unresolved source. This will also
be case in the analysis of extrasolar terrestrial planet transit light curves
of very high photometric precision (e.g., such as those to be obtained by
the
Kepler mission).
At the time of the transit, between contacts II and III, the planetary
disk of Venus occulted 0.0942% of the solar photosphere. But, with an optically
opaque atmosphere to 60 km (beyond the mesospheric cloud layer) above the
surface the areal coverage was 0.0961%, thus (geometrically) blocking an
additional 0.002% of the received TSI (if not preferentially forward scattered,
refracted, or re-radiated by the atmosphere). We tested the ability
to discriminate against a 1% equivalent increment in an Earth-like planetary
radius (by the presence of Venus's opaque atmosphere) in light of both spatial
and temporal solar photospheric "surface" brightness (PSB) variations.
The solar PSB decreases radially from the heliocenter because of limb
darkening. The PSB is also instantaneously non-heterogenous on angular scales
of ~ 1" due to solar granulation, and on larger scales due to features such
as sunspots. Thus, the TSI received at ACRIM (and corrected to 1AU)
is expected to vary as Venus occults different portions of the photosphere
during its transit due to spatial variations in PSB, separate from also expected
temporal variations. We investigated the likely amplitudes of PSB variations after
compensating limb darkening as they may affect ACRIM 3 measures of TSI with
contemporaneous high-resolution imagery obtained with the TRACE spacecraft
in its very spectrally broad WL channel (appx. 0.1 - 1.0 microns).
We performed temporally and spatially resolved (and independent) limb-darkening
corrected differential photometry of regions flanking the location of Venus
as it transitedthe photosphere. With that we obtained statistical expectations
of the levels of variability in TSI due to partial photospheric occultation
at the angular scale of Venus.
Left: Representative TRACE WL image (one
of 100 time-sliced images for this spacecraft pointing spanning 40 minutes
of time) of Venus transiting the solar photosphere with photometric apertures
used (each enclosing 10, 923 TRACE pixels) to evaluate the temporal and spatial
variability of the PSB on the size scale of Venus seen in projection. Right:
Difference image (at same display dynamic range) illustrating the change
in PSB at the cadence of ACRIM 3 sampling (also illustrating the movement
of Venus over 132s at the indicated times).
Variation in total solar flux density decrement
(0.1 to 1.0 microns) due to photospheric occultation by a Venus-size planet
arising from temporal and spatial PSB variations (illustrated for 9 regions
of the Sun as in the previous figure, during the 8 June 2004 Venus transit).
Boxes indicate upper and lower quartiles about measured medians (black lines)
of 100 samples. Bars indicate +/- 2-sigma variations about sample means,
with 1-sigma (in delta percent) indicted above.
-
Temporal changes in TSI due to Venus occultation of any
fixed region of the Sun tested (e.g., denoted A-I in Fig 1) were found to
be +/- ~ 0.0018% one-sigma (compared to a 0.0019% expected change
in signal) with inter-region variations in internal dispersions of
+/- 0.00022%. Hence, a sensitivity to the presence vs. absence of a Venus-like
opaque planetary atmosphere was tested at only a 1.05-sigma level of confidence.
-
TSI variations due to spatial anisotropies in PSB on Venus-size
angular scales were found dispersed by ~ +/-0.0015% one-sigma about an
expected decrement in TSI of 0.0961% due to the presence of Venus imposed
on the photosphere with compensation for limb-darkening (I.e., a 1.3 sigma
"detection" of the atmosphere of Venus).
The virtual equivalence of the two measures and their uncertainties implicates
no significant systematic effects in this data set from large spatial scale
PSB variations (after proper limb-darkening compensation) in excess of
limiting detection sensitivities from temporal effects.
SUMMARY
The spatially unresolved Venus transit light curve obtained by ACRIMSAT
(and a similar one obtained by SORCE/TIM) is the closest proxy to an extrasolar
terrestrial planetary (ETP) transit which exists. Given our apriori knowledge
of this star/planet system geometry and properties, this data set may be
exploited uniquely to test the detectability of ETP transits using methods
contemplated by future space-based planet-finding missions. With sufficient
photometric precision, proper characterization of the effects of stellar limb-darkening
can yield information on the vertical structures in stellar atmospheres,
and have the potential of informing of the existence of a transiting planetary
atmospheres as well.
The amplitudes and dispersions of both the temporal and spatial solar
PSB variations limit the ability to radiometrically discriminate with sufficient
statistical significance the presence vs. absence of a Venus-like opaque
planetary atmosphere for an Earth-sized transiting planet
. ACRIM 3
has a
single measure (i.e., 2.2 minute
"shutter cycle") radiometric precision of 10
-4. By comparison,
the goal for Kepler differential photometry is a factor of 5 better on timescales
of 2 to 16 hours will yielding 4-sigma planet detections for a single transit.
But, the effects of intrinsic solar-like PSB variations as assessed from
ACRIM 3 and TRACE measures of the recent Venus transit would likely preclude
the photometric inference of planetary atmospheres for Earth-size planets
of solar-like stars. Hence, alternate stratagies such as spectroscopic
capabilities on subsequent missions (e.g., an integral field spectrograph
on TPF-C) must be considered.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are indebted to Richard C. Willson, Principal Investigator for ACRIM
experiments, for providing us with such an excellent and unique data set,
and to the ACRIM team for building and commissioning such a fine instrument.
Link to 2004 Transit of Venus Web Site at Williams College